Subject: [Fwd: Re: [Fwd: Quick Poll]]
From: Randy Kramer (rhkramer@fast.net)
Date: Tue Aug 14 2001 - 11:36:48 CDT
Forwarded from the user list.
attached mail follows:
> For our (x)html exporter, we currently export individual images into the
> same directory as the exported (x)html file, and then provide a fully
> qualified path to them within the (x)html file. I want to ask whether
> we want to keep it this way or change it such that the exported images
> are referred to by a relative path. I think this way would be more
> portable and flexible.
I'm learning "C" currently so I'm not sure I should comment? but what is
being suggested makes sense to me and that is should be relative.
>
> In the same vein, do we want to create a new directory (I was thinking
> of something along the lines of ${filename}_d) which will hold the image
> files for the document? I was thinking that this would have the
> advantage that if a user wants to move the document around (such as to
> the web server tree), then he or she only has to move the .html file and
> the directory with the images in parallel with one another, and nothing
> breaks. It seems easier to use, to me.
same here as above for flexibility yes.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue Aug 14 2001 - 11:35:49 CDT