Re: policy -- taking the code guidelines seriously


Subject: Re: policy -- taking the code guidelines seriously
From: Michael D. Crawford (crawford@goingware.com)
Date: Tue Aug 21 2001 - 16:04:56 CDT


> I've tried to mostly conform to these guidelines when writing my wordperfect
> importer. However, I really strongly take exception to using Hungarian
> notation in my code. Is this really a necessary part of the guidelines?

(Speaking as a lurker who's yet to make an actual contribution to Abi...)

I found Hungarian useful on a C project I did years ago, but in the C++ code I
do now, I just don't see the point of Hungarian. I think a much better style is
that used in Metrowerks powerplant, where you use "in" and "out" for parameters:

void Foo( int inParam, int *outResult );

and using "m" (for member) or "f" (for field) for member variables.

Mike

-- 
Michael D. Crawford
GoingWare Inc. - Expert Software Development and Consulting
http://www.goingware.com
crawford@goingware.com

Tilting at Windmills for a Better Tomorrow.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Tue Aug 21 2001 - 16:02:10 CDT