Subject: Re: current abiword spec file SUCKS!
From: Rui Miguel Seabra (rms@multicert.com)
Date: Mon Nov 19 2001 - 08:57:57 CST
On Sun, 2001-11-18 at 12:47, Blue Lizard wrote:
> Get your attention? Good, I didn't really mean it.
> However, a lot needs to change. Currently, the source rpm is _way_ too
> different from the actual source. Meaning, I (and Martin once he
> receives my email)(oh, btw, he had me making plugin spec files) think it
> should look a tad more like cvs snapshot.
Send me your spec file.
I haven't substituted the current abiword spec file because noone has
replied to an email where I asked for input about doing that.
I have a hugely worked out spec, which I have been using (check
greymalkin.yi.org/fs/abiword fro the results, and the spec is in the
src.rpm)
I aim to put the plugins in seperate rpms, but for that I would rather
have them compile without too much extra work.
To compile plugins, right now, you need to have the abiword source tree.
I don't know exactly what we would need to make an abiword-devel package
in order to compile without that.
Hugs, rms
-- + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown + Whatever you do will be insignificant, | but it is very important that you do it -- Ghandi + So let's do it...?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b25 : Mon Nov 19 2001 - 07:59:33 CST