Re: About AbiWord vs OEONE

From: Alan Horkan (horkana@tcd.ie)
Date: Tue May 07 2002 - 09:42:58 EDT

  • Next message: phearbear: "Re: commit (HEAD): IMPORTANT - 32-bit UT_UCSChar"

    Starting the message with the important link
    http://abiword.sourceforge.net/oeone.html
    would have helped.

    The way i read your email it was not clear that Oeone had not
    adequately released their changes on the previous occassion.
    I was under the impression that they had complied that the issue was
    largely taken care of and that you were concerned with particular and
    specific details.

    It was not clear that Oeone had grossly failed to release the necessary
    source even to the Abiword developers and that the issue had been
    officially reopened.

    I look forward to seeing this and the release announcement on Slashdot if
    it does not get resolved in a timely manner. Would make for a hell of a
    lot of publicity and we get to show how wondefully reasonable the
    developers have been.

    Sincerely
    Alan

    On 7 May 2002, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:

    > Date: 07 May 2002 14:27:39 +0100
    > From: Rui Miguel Silva Seabra <rms@1407.org>
    > To: abiword-dev@abisource.com
    > Subject: Re: About AbiWord vs OEONE
    >
    > On Tue, 2002-05-07 at 09:54, Alan Horkan wrote:
    > > And Rui, you do know that Dom was provided a copy of the code by Oeone.
    > > He and hub are probably the only ones who really know what is going on, i
    > > strongly recommend talking to them directly.
    >
    > I know, and if you read the link, you will notice that there's news
    > about that code... bad news.
    >
    > Hugs, rms
    >
    > --
    > + No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
    > + Whatever you do will be insignificant,
    > | but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
    > + So let's do it...?
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Tue May 07 2002 - 09:45:57 EDT