From: Blue Lizard (webmaster@dofty.zzn.com)
Date: Wed May 08 2002 - 18:21:24 EDT
On Wed, 2002-05-08 at 01:50, sam th wrote:
>
> 1. A calendar for 1.0.x releases. Once a month - 2 months seems about
> right to me.
I would lean more to the longer side of that, unless there are a lot of
bugfixes in a given period of time. We can always flex (within reason).
>
> 2. A more detailed set of criteria for what checkins are allowed on the
> branch. Personally, I think that after 1.0.2, no checkins should be
> allowed on the branch without branch maintainer's approval. This will
> ensure the continued stability of the branch.
Agreed very much that with the core developers input a well defined
ruleset should be published (unlike mozilla, we do not, or even need to,
restrict commit access within the developer set). I think that at least
for the beginning, a combination of bonsai and active regression tests
shall suffice for keeping track.
Really though, I wanna hear what the core developers have to say.
AFAIK, after Dec 02, stable branch is buried and we get a new one like
1.2 (assuming jody's GO schedule holds, which it prolly won't, and may
be pushed back as far as march if things go bad )-:).
Anyway, that's my bloated 2 bucks.
>
> And we already have a volunteer. Yay!
I'm actually surprised noone else has volunteered yet.
Best regards
-MG
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Wed May 08 2002 - 18:23:54 EDT