Re: why insist on python 2.3?

From: Francis James Franklin <postmaster_at_alinameridon.plus.com>
Date: Fri Apr 01 2005 - 20:02:36 CEST

On 1 Apr 2005, at 16:38, sean wrote:
> I'm building cvs STABLE with Fedora 4 test2 on amd64. gypsython is
> hard coded for python 2.3. See gypsython/plugin.m4.
>
> Is 2.3 really required? Or just python >= 2.3?

I honestly don't know. Can you find out for us?
Frank
Received on Fri Apr 1 20:04:10 2005

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: why insist on python 2.3?"
Previous message: sean: "why insist on python 2.3?"
In reply to: sean: "why insist on python 2.3?"
Next in thread: Dom Lachowicz: "Re: why insist on python 2.3?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 01 2005 - 20:04:10 CEST