Hi Martin,
> Whoops! We should have talked first dom :-) I was
> busily working through
> this myself.
Well, my code is pretty simple, but it'll get the job
done for now.
> I agree their build system is pretty screwy.
Within 36 hours, I'll have an auto*-enabled,
pkg-config-enabled tarball up for public consumption.
> I'll look at what you've done and how it fits into
> what I was thinking of.
Well, you had 1 method, and I implemented it :)
> Have you grokked all the link-stuff? It appears it
> might be possible to
> isolate where in a sentence the grammar goes bad as
> well determining if
> a sentence is grammatically incorrect overall.
I grokked it 2 years ago. I'm actually pretty confused
why you did this instead of just working within the
link-grammar plugin directory...
It is also possible to isolate where it went wrong.
Right now, I've implemented an all-or-nothing "is this
sentence correct" method instead of highlighting just
the bad parts.
> If we can work this out we can put our squiggles in
> the wrong part of the
> sentence.
We can put our squiggles on the correct part of the
sentence - the part that's ungrammatical :) For now,
squiggling the whole sentence is pretty good. We
should also check out OOo's linguacomponent stuff -
they apparently have a grammar checker and thesaurus
as well.
Best,
Dom
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
Received on Fri Feb 4 16:19:24 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Feb 04 2005 - 16:19:24 CET