> Could you please explain to me why we'd need a
> high-performance FastString class for the dialog
> framework? I can see why we might need one elsewhere
> (like PT/FMT), though I'd be more inclined to trust
> gprof's results than a programmer's "intuition."
It is not something I wan't specifically to do for the dialog framework.
We need a FastString wherever we need some UTF-8 char* that is not
modified after construction. That use case there is typical, but not the
only one.
This will take part in by string re-work I plan to do a little bit
later. We currently have 3 or 4 different string classes that don't
inherit from the same base class, which is bad.
I'm not sure I'll have time to do it completely for 2.4.
>
> And please, folks - stop CC'ing me. Take the 3 seconds
sorry, hit the wrong key in Evolution.
Thunderbind sucks for that, because to take 15sec to suppress the Cc:
Hub
-- Crazy French - http://www.figuiere.net/hub/Received on Mon Feb 7 17:05:39 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Feb 07 2005 - 17:05:39 CET