> I'm hesitant to call this a "feature" - it's more akin
> to polishing an existing feature, and it's this kind
> of polish that a release needs in order to shine.
Agreed, BUT:
If the polish to an existing feature is big (like this one), and we are
in a feature freeze, then such patches should only be accepted with
extreme care.
If there turn out to be regressions, then they should fixed _soon_ (as
in 1 week), or imo the patch must be reverted.
Marc
Received on Tue May 10 20:01:48 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue May 10 2005 - 20:01:48 CEST