Re: Can we commit new updates to HEAD?

From: J.M. Maurer <uwog_at_uwog.net>
Date: Fri Oct 14 2005 - 16:57:50 CEST

On Fri, 2005-10-14 at 12:49 +0100, Roland Kay wrote:
>
> Just two quick questions:
>
> Is it OK to commit substantial amounts of code to CVS HEAD yet? I
> wouldn't mind getting my progress on #9240 into the tree now that 2.4.0
> is out of the way. Not urgent, but I don't want to leave it too long
> because things will get harder to integrate.

No please, as HEAD is still declared STABLE. We didn't branch yet.

> Marc: I tried twice to reply off list to your email about the
> 2.4.0 change log. Did you get either copy or is something eating my
> email?

Yes, and i replied :-) Short version: it was unfortunately too late to
get in the 2.4.0 release notes.

.. back to work for me..
  Marc
Received on Fri Oct 14 16:57:36 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Oct 14 2005 - 16:57:36 CEST