Re: DEBATE: glib, libgsf in main build.

From: J.M. Maurer <uwog_at_uwog.net>
Date: Wed Oct 19 2005 - 14:26:48 CEST

> (though you guys probably still recall :-) but
> last time this was brought up I thought it was decided to make glib a
> requirement for the 2.4/2.6 tree explicitly so I/O could switch to using
> libgsf.

yeah, Dom didn't get of his lazy ass to code it....

Marc

/me braches for the wrath of dom
Received on Wed Oct 19 14:26:35 2005

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: leonardr_at_lazerware.com: "Re: document"
Previous message: Kenneth J. Davis: "Re: DEBATE: glib, libgsf in main build."
In reply to: Kenneth J. Davis: "Re: DEBATE: glib, libgsf in main build."
Next in thread: Alan Horkan: "Re: DEBATE: glib, libgsf in main build."

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Oct 19 2005 - 14:26:35 CEST