Ryan Pavlik wrote:
> The new WV requires glib on Win32, and I'm fairly certain I also need to
> build libgsf for that as well. So for me, recent glib and libgsf in the
> main Win32 dist. for 2.6 is a done deal: it's necessary already.
We also have a major problem on win32 with filenames that do not use
Latin1 charset; when I looked into fixing it in the past, it turned out
to be impossible without introducing some new UT_ I/O functions. My
understanding is that using libgsf will give us proper Unicode filenames
on win32 and I think it is better than creating yet another abstraction
layer of our own.
I also agree with martin that now that we have made glib a dependency,
it would make sense to refactor the UT_ layer to make maximum use of it
and eliminate any unnecessary code of our own.
Tomas
Received on Tue Feb 21 08:56:32 2006
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Feb 21 2006 - 08:56:32 CET