Re: link-grammar: API concerning constituents.

Hi Vee,

I've checked in a change that should make you happy.
If there is anything else I can do for you, just let
me know.

Best,
Dom

--- Vee Satayamas <veetai@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
> Hello,
>
> I have talked to uwog and dom in IRC about the
> functions for handling constituency tree (CNode) in
> Link-grammar public API, which will be useful for
> its
> Ruby binding and further natural language
> application.
>
>
> In brief, linkage_constituent_tree,
> linkage_free_constituent_tree and the members of
> CNode
> are needed to be accessed.
>
> Btw, the patch is included in this mail, as Dom's
> suggestion. However I don't know whether struct
> CNode_s {....} should be added to public API or
> additional functions for indirectly accessing
> CNode's
> members should be provided.
>
>
http://vee.pompokoisme.com/patch/link-grammar-constituent.diff
>
> Regards,
> Vee Satayamas
>
>
>
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Word and Powerpoint files may not be opened
> perfectly
> by the softwares in my computer.
>
> My homepage: http://www.geocities.com/veetai/
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Received on Sun Jun 18 20:49:24 2006