Re: New strux and field elements for Annotations.

From: J.M. Maurer <uwog_at_uwog.net>
Date: Tue Jul 24 2007 - 10:23:08 CEST

On Tue, 2007-07-24 at 10:47 +1000, msevior@physics.unimelb.edu.au wrote:
>
> <ann Annotation:123><annotate Annotation:123><b style:normal>Some
> text</b></annotate></ann>

How do <ann Annotation:123> and <annotate Annotation:123> differ? Ie,
why not use one of the tags?

Hooray for progress!
Marc
Received on Tue Jul 24 10:21:33 2007

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: J.M. Maurer: "Re: riverae - r21644 - in abiword/branches/RiveraESoC/src/wp/ap: unix xp"
Previous message: msevior_at_physics.unimelb.edu.au: "New strux and field elements for Annotations."
In reply to: msevior_at_physics.unimelb.edu.au: "New strux and field elements for Annotations."
Next in thread: Leonard Rosenthol: "Re: New strux and field elements for Annotations."

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Jul 24 2007 - 10:21:33 CEST