Re: Replacing libglade with GtkBuilder

Hubert Figuiere wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-08-14 at 03:10 +0200, J.M. Maurer wrote:
>> Any objections? Ryan already raised the issue of Maemo shipping with
>> gtk
>> 2.10 instead of required 2.12. I'm not sure though if we should 'care'
>> about the current maemo releases in trunk (we have 2.6.x for that
>> platform for the next year or more).
>
> Do they plan to upgrade it?
>
> Anyway I think that most of the dialogs are inappropriate for Maemo. So
> that make it moot.
>
> Hub
>
>

Inappropriate or not (actually, only a few don't fit the screen, Styles
being one of them) we currently use nearly all of the standard desktop
dialogs, so a switch to gtkbuilder would either mean dropping Maemo
support until a version is released with gtk 2.12+ (the roadmap is in
progress and should be known by the end of september), or a whole lot of
ifdefs disabling features and code on embedded devices.

Ryan

-- 
Ryan Pavlik
www.cleardefinition.com
#282  +  (442) -  [X]
A programmer started to cuss
Because getting to sleep was a fuss
As he lay there in bed
Looping 'round in his head
was: while(!asleep()) sheep++;